Continuing the Scaling of Digital Computing Post Moore’s Law

Primary tabs

100732 activity 001
N/A
N/A
Michelogiannakis, G., Shalf, J., Donofrio, D., & Bachan, J. (2016). Continuing the Scaling of Digital Computing Post Moore’s Law. - Report Number: LBNL-1005126
PDF
Metadata
TitleContinuing the Scaling of Digital Computing Post Moore’s Law
AuthorsG. Michelogiannakis, J. Shalf, D. Donofrio, J. Bachan
AbstractThe approaching end of traditional CMOS technology scaling that up until now followed Moore's law is coming to an end in the next decade. However, the DOE has come to depend on the rapid, predictable, and cheap scaling of computing performance to meet mission needs for scientific theory, large scale experiments, and national security. Moving forward, performance scaling of digital computing will need to originate from energy and cost reductions that are a result of novel architectures, devices, manufacturing technologies, and programming models. The deeper issue presented by these changes is the threat to DOE’s mission and to the future economic growth of the U.S. computing industry and to society as a whole. With the impending end of Moore’s law, it is imperative for the Office of Advanced Scientific Computing Research (ASCR) to develop a balanced research agenda to assess the viability of novel semiconductor technologies and navigate the ensuing challenges. This report identifies four areas and research directions for ASCR and how each can be used to preserve performance scaling of digital computing beyond exascale and after Moore's law ends.
Date4/28/2016
NoteThis technical report has not been submitted elsewhere, nor will it be submitted elsewhere., This is a report that describes the state of a field with opinions on research directions to tackle future challenges. It does not describe a novel invention., SC Office of Advanced Scientific Computing Research (SC-21)

Bookmarks:

Disclaimer: This document was prepared as an account of work sponsored by the United States Government. While this document is believed to contain correct information, neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor the Regents of the University of California, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, process, or service by its trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise, does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government or any agency thereof, or the Regents of the University of California. The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily state or reflect those of the United States Government or any agency thereof or the Regents of the University of California.

Copyright: Unless explicitly noted otherwise in the text, this manuscript has been authored by an author at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory under one of the following three contracts with the U.S. Department of Energy (or its predecessor agencies), depending on the date of the publication:

  • Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231—2005 to the present
  • Contract No. DE-AC03-76SF00098—1982-2005
  • Contract No. W-7405-ENG-48—1943-1982

The U.S. Government retains, and the publisher, by accepting the article for publication, acknowledges, that the U.S. Government retains a non-exclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, world-wide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this manuscript, or allow others to do so, for U.S. Government purposes.

This Publication is Subject to Copyright and Disclaimers. Click Here for More Information.